I'm just trying the demo so as far as I get, there's only a filter for A,B,N,S
Wouldn't it be better if we had this option to have a separate filter for each? The filter screen could simply been updated when selecting each of A,B,N,S…
Any special reason behind this design?
(not to seem ungrateful or anything as it's still incredible as is, but I'm curious to hear the thoughts behind this as well - perhaps it's a bit of a pandora's box - once this were implemented, he'd more than likely start getting more ubiquitous requests to expand the amount of slots in the modulation matrix and perhaps that would be a struggle for reasons I can't anticipate.)
more filters = more CPU, I opted for stereo filters instead of dual mono, considering unison/stereo factor, and considering the WT editing abilities (e.g. HPF or LPF on a wavetable set is easy with no runtime CPU cost).
But somewhat related, there's some good stuff coming, updates are always free.
Very excited to see what comes =).
(Really loving the adjustable MB thresholds / stereo wavetable functionality. ^_^)